Iraqi Dinar
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Federal Court responds to request not to ratify the election results

Go down

Federal Court responds to request not to ratify the election results Empty Federal Court responds to request not to ratify the election results

Post  Admin Sun May 27, 2018 9:27 am



aljournal May 27, 2018



The Federal Supreme Court on Sunday filed a lawsuit demanding that it not ratify the results of the elections of the House of Representatives on the pretext of the presence of violations accompanied the electoral process, explaining that the judiciary does not contest and does not count in the facts attributed to other persons or parties.

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session today and considered a lawsuit against the electoral violations that accompanied the election process of the House of Representatives on 12/15/2018," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement. The President of the Federal Supreme Court / in addition to the function, not to ratify the results of those elections in accordance with the text of Article (93 / VII) of the Constitution.

He added that "the court confirmed that the judiciary does not contest and does not count against the facts attributed to other persons or parties," explaining that "the issue concerns the Independent High Electoral Commission, which is in charge of accepting complaints and objections to alleged violations, which occur during the electoral process, And that its decision is subject to appeal before a judicial body, the judiciary in the Federal Court of Cassation.

"The court explained that article 4 of the Civil Procedure Law No. 83 of 1969 stipulated that the plaintiff in the case is a competitor whose approval of the facts of the dispute entails a judgment in those facts in favor of the plaintiffs, and since the plaintiff does not have the right to certify the facts received In the case or not because they did not issue these facts in the case of proven, but attributed to the issuance of those attributed to him.

He noted that "the court therefore decided to respond to the claim that the dispute is not addressed to the plaintiff / in addition to his function, based on the provisions of Articles 4 and 80/1 of the Code of Civil Procedure mentioned above.

http://www.aljournal.com/المحكمة-الاتحادية-ترد-دعوى-طلب-عدم-الم/

Admin
Admin

Posts : 29357
Join date : 2012-04-30
Location : Arizona

https://iraqidinar.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum