The "big bloc" debate continues between the winning political entities

08/9/2018 12:00 am

Constitutional expert: It is difficult to change the interpretation of the Federal Court
Baghdad / Al-Sabah
In the scenes of the political scene, the heated debate between the winning political entities in the elections over the interpretation of the largest bloc that will take on the formation of the next government continues. While parties in the "reform and reconstruction" and "construction" alliances deny that there are direct talks between " , Announced the leader of the «Arab project» Khamis Khanjar split from the coalition decision and the formation of a parliamentary bloc of 10 members of the House of Representatives.
"The Federal Court has not yet played its role on the largest bloc, especially as the parliament did not address them, and what is happening today on referring the issue of the largest bloc to the court just the jurisprudence of the political blocs." The researcher on the electoral and constitutional issue Abdul Aziz al-Issawi said in a press statement.
"The Federal Court interpreted the largest bloc since 2010, but there is another party that says that this explanation is not clear and if the Federal Court is addressed, the court will not retreat from its interpretation in accordance with the current circumstances." He explained Issawi, "The interpretation of the Federal Court Current on the largest bloc serves the bloc of reform », stressing that« change the interpretation of the largest bloc of the Federal Court is very difficult ».
The expert stressed that «the first step in the House of Representatives is the announcement of the largest bloc, and then the election of the President of Parliament and then the election of the President of the Republic, which in turn will cost the candidate of the largest bloc to form a government».


See wisdom
For his part, said a member of the current stream of wisdom within the bloc of reform and reconstruction Hassan Masoudi in an interview: The «Federal Court decision in 2010 on the interpretation of the largest bloc was clear and accurate and does not require interpretations, The winners, "noting that" the moral and political commitment indicates that the deputies did not raise their votes, but the votes of their lists most, and the custom emphasizes the need to stay MP in the list, which rose through them until the resolution of alliances.
"This matter is important and we would like to be included in the law of parties, but we believe that there is a need to amend the law during this session to correct this important and moral part," Masoudi said, pointing out that "any inquiry sent to the Federal Court on the largest bloc should Be through the president-elect because the head of the age-specific powers in certain things ».


Hadith of conquest
On the other hand, the MP for the alliance of conquest Razak Muhaibis: The «resolve of the three presidencies will not be achieved unless the Federal Court decides and provide its final interpretation on the largest bloc and any block apply to the status of the largest bloc now», noting that «the three presidencies linked to each other and therefore, "It takes time to name the biggest bloc." "The building block is the closest to be considered the largest bloc according to article 76 of the Constitution first, which identified the largest parliamentary bloc with the largest bloc, which applies to the building block after the submission of 153 signatures alive for deputies directly."


Political dialogues
On the other hand, denied the leadership in the bloc of reform and reconstruction Abdullah al-Zaidi, the existence of any side dialogues between the blocs and the opening and the opening on the formation of the next government away from the alliance of reform and reconstruction. Zaidi said in an interview: "There is inaccurate news circulated by some media about the existence of side dialogues between the people and the opening to form the largest bloc away from the bloc of reform and reconstruction," noting that "these news are not true, attempts to distort the image and mix the papers and influence the opinion General ». Al-Zaidi added that "the dialogues have not ended and they continue from the elections until the moment and will continue between the political leaders to discuss all the issues that concern the Iraqi state, which will not be limited to dialogues to form a bloc only because Iraq and its concerns are greater than these narrow angles." He pointed out that " Is still open to everyone by the national majority project and we believe that the presence of the opening within the political decision is necessary for the stability of the government and its success in providing services and meet the demands of the masses ».
The media have reported on the news that there are dialogues between the leaders of the others with the Fatah alliance in order to join others to the block building.
For his part, said MP for the alliance Al-Fath Ahmed Kanani: «The Alliance of Fatah has an initiative and others have an initiative also, and there is a difference of views in the administration of the next government between the two alliances», adding that «the political parties may make concessions to each other for the formation of the government , And may reveal the next few days to resolve some things between the blocks ».


Allawi Office
In a related context, denied the Office of the President of the National Coalition Iyad Allawi, Allawi's intention to withdraw from the parliament and waive his parliamentary seat, and the media office of Allawi in a press statement: «There is no official move so far in regard to the withdrawal of the leader of the National Coalition, Iyad Allawi, Parliament, "noting that« the news that was published in some of the media is baseless », and some media have reported on Allawi's intention to withdraw from parliament and to relinquish his parliamentary seat as a result of the tug-of-war in the political arena.


Splintering of the dagger
"The project is still negotiating with all political parties and stands at one distance from all blocs," he said in a statement. The statement pointed out that «the Arab project has no agreement with any party except the understanding with the Kurds on the form of the next government and the controls of any institutional work goes its decisions».
On the other hand, the coalition said in a statement received «morning» a copy of it: «Commenting on the announcement of Khamis Dagger dissection of the Arab project party on the coalition and the formation of an independent bloc within the parliament, we would like to make clear that this action came after the impasse reached by the dagger Negotiate with all political parties ».
The coalition added, «after the inability of the coalition decision to convince the party close to our approach to accept negotiations with the person of the dagger, despite our efforts in this direction, tried to maneuver with the cross-party with the Iraqi draft resolution in the hope of closing the previous files in exchange for alliance with them», That «this action was not acceptable to members of the coalition decision and not his audience, who knows the party closest to him well».
The coalition expressed hope that "the dagger and those who chose to go with him; do not go away from the aspirations of the public of our regions and not to pledge their work for the electoral cycle to settle files that we were not part of them," according to the statement.


Kurdish positions
In the same context, the leadership of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, Sobhi Mandalawi, for the reasons that made the Kurdish delegations do not resolve their position to join any of the two axes in Baghdad. The Mandalawi said in an interview: "The main reason for the delay in resolving the Kurds to their position of the two sides of the problems in Baghdad is the lack of clarity and the repetition of the same methods in the previous dialogues," noting that "repeating the same mentality and wrong policies in the previous stage makes us unscrupulous about meeting the constitutional demands that "The Kurds are trying as much as possible to stay in the middle area until the nearest axis is found and able to provide real and effective guarantees to meet the demands either through international guarantees or the declaration of the terms of the agreement openly before the people of the country Valuable time Ptoukitat », pointing out that« meet the demands is the way to resolve the crisis must be thinking about a new mentality that allows not to repeat past mistakes especially as we are not prepared to repeat the mistakes
Past ».


http://www.alsabaah.iq/ArticleShow.aspx?ID=162778